Rupert Grint: New Photos, Interview and Cherrybomb Review!

Rupert Grint: New Photos, Interview and Cherrybomb Review! April 20th, 2010, 11:55am–It doesn’t look like we’ll have any time off because we have some more Rupert Grint news with Cherrybomb. First up is an interview with Instyle Magazine UK. In it, Rupert talks about the sex scene (he didn’t know where to put his hands!) and among other things. You can read all about it here!

PopSugar also has some exclusive photos of Rupert at the Cherrybomb screening yesterday along with his co-stars Kimberley Nixon and Robert Sheehan and you can see those here.

Speaking of photos, you can see new HQ ones in our gallery here!

Lastly, but not least, a new review praising Rupert’s performance in Cherrybomb from Time Out London.

‘Harry Potter’ stalwart Rupert Grint confirms he has the acting chops for the long haul
Right down to the impeccable Ulster accent, Grint is note perfect

You can read the entire review here.

Thanks Marite and InStyle!

15 Comments to "Rupert Grint: New Photos, Interview and Cherrybomb Review!"

April 20th, 2010 at 12:10 PM

Mystery SOLVED! know what i am talking about??!! look at the new photos and guess!

April 20th, 2010 at 12:12 PM

Love this new HQs…hope still more to arrive soon!

April 20th, 2010 at 12:31 PM

I don’t know what you mean Jo. LOL The dude in the mustache?

I wish the review of the movie was better, but love what Time Out said about Rupert. This will be on the reviews section soon. πŸ™‚

April 20th, 2010 at 12:38 PM

Remember TGIF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!???? It’s his driver! We tried to figure it out for years now! Is it an uncle, was he talking to an agent etc… We were so silly…

SO he’s the dude who’s picked up our crazy cookbooks and all of the other stuff we send Rupert lol.

April 20th, 2010 at 1:51 PM

LOL That’s so funny. I remember all that… now we know he is! I didn’t think it was a family member. But how cute that he’d have lunch (or dinner?) with his driver!

April 20th, 2010 at 2:45 PM

Great to see Rupert praised like that! πŸ˜€

But ew. 2 out of 5 πŸ™

April 20th, 2010 at 2:49 PM

Yeah, these reviewers are expecting too much. Instead of allowing the film to be simplistic, like it’s meant to be, they are trying to review as oscar winning. It’s not. It never tries to be. It’s a good film on those merits. πŸ™‚

April 20th, 2010 at 2:59 PM

look what just came up on my twitter πŸ˜€
enjoy ladies!

April 20th, 2010 at 3:00 PM

Well that’s not fair then. I mean, it’s a low budget independent film for cryin out loud lol.

April 20th, 2010 at 3:02 PM

I don’t think they’re trying to review it as an Oscar winner. I think they simply didn’t enjoy it.

No mystery.

April 20th, 2010 at 3:17 PM

I think we’re looking into the poor reviews too hard. Yes, the News of the World guy was a prick and shouldn’t be taken seriously, but perhaps; just perhaps, the others gave it a poor review, because they didn’t like it.

No mystery, no “they were trying to review it as something else”. Maybe they just plain didn’t enjoy it.

April 20th, 2010 at 3:54 PM

No, I didn’t say that. What I meant was that they are looking for it to be beyond just a simple film instead of taking it on its merits. I was saying ‘oscar’ just to say they’re putting it to that bar rather than the small, simplistic film that it is. πŸ™‚

April 20th, 2010 at 4:05 PM

Oh I see, okay. Groovy.

April 20th, 2010 at 9:59 PM

I can respect folks not enjoying the film (of course it’s all great if the do) because even I have a plus/delta on what I liked and what I didn’t like, and I can even understand some of the issues folks have.

Not talking about this review, but it’s just the ones that really say noting on Rupert’s or anyone elses performance. They just comment on looks and stuff, and your left like, what.

It’s like that time when I was younger and my mother had to come up to the school because my teacher told her “if looks could kill, I’d be dead.” And my mother was like, ok, what did she do?

But, that has nothing to do with this, does it?

Anyway, the best thing is, NO ONE has said anything bad about Rupert’s performance. Even if they have issues with the script or other things, it’s not like anyone has said, “that Rupert can’t act!”

And we all know that….

Rupert must ACT!!!

April 20th, 2010 at 10:13 PM

Oh, I agree with that AJ. I think my beef is that a lot of these reviewers want it to be at a certain level and it’s not meant to be. You know? I have a few things I dislike about it, I’m sure we all did (or will). But I also took it for what it was worth… a simplistic look at teenage life because really, is teenage life really that drastic? It never set out to be anything but what it is and I think if more reviewers had taken that into account, there would probably be a little less in the bad review department. Or at least with those that said, “It could have been more…” Those are the ones that bug me. πŸ˜›